By Jack Hoadley, Kennah Watts, and Zachary Baron
The No Surprises Act (NSA) protects shoppers from shock out-of-network (OON) billing by banning suppliers and services from steadiness billing shoppers for a lot of facility-based OON medical companies. Providers topic to the legislation embrace most emergency companies, non-emergency companies from OON suppliers at in-network services, and companies from OON air ambulance suppliers.
Below the legislation, the payer should make a well timed cost (or a denial of protection) to the OON supplier. If the supplier finds the cost quantity insufficient and the events don’t privately attain an settlement, both occasion can request an impartial dispute decision (IDR), wherein a third-party arbitrator (“IDR entity”) binds each events to both the plan or supplier supply.
In 2024, in compliance with NSA necessities, the related federal businesses launched public use information (PUFs) with knowledge on the resolved IDR circumstances for 2023. In March 2025, the businesses launched PUFs for the primary two quarters of 2024. These information embrace data on the supplier and payer, in addition to supply quantities from every occasion––expressed as a share of a qualifying cost quantity (QPA), the inflation-adjusted median charge paid by a particular insurer in 2019 to its contracted in-network suppliers, based mostly on insurance coverage kind and geographic location. The information additionally embrace data on the prevailing supply, as decided by the IDR entity.
On this article, we construct on our findings from 2023 with evaluation from the primary two quarters of 2024. We illustrate tendencies within the IDR course of throughout supplier and payer sorts, supply quantities, geographic places, IDR entities, and extra. We additionally discover potential implications for the longer term use and price of the IDR course of. As related, we share findings from the businesses’ supplemental tables, from our personal evaluation of the PUFs, and from discussions with stakeholders.
Speedy Charges Of New Case Filings; Extra Choices Rising From IDR Entities
The quantity of filed IDR circumstances remained excessive. The six-month whole for filed circumstances (586,581) in Q1 and Q2 of 2024 is almost as excessive as all of 2023 (657,040 filed circumstances), although this can be partly on account of durations in 2023 when the IDR portal was suspended.
Exhibit 1. Variety of Filed IDR Circumstances and Share Initiated by Supplier Teams, Q1-This autumn 2023 and Q1-Q2 2024
Supply: Authors’ evaluation of Federal IDR Supplemental Tables for 2023 and 2024
The speed of filed circumstances challenged as ineligible was greater in Q1 and Q2 of 2024 (45 %) than in all of 2023 (37 %), however the charge of closed circumstances later discovered ineligible was considerably decrease: about 18 % in 2024 versus 22 % in 2023. Circumstances could also be ineligible based mostly on the dates of service, whether or not a case is roofed by the NSA, or the necessity to undergo a state cost dedication course of in sure states.
In 2024, the tempo of IDR entity decision-making accelerated considerably. About 335,000 cost determinations had been made in Q1 and Q2 of 2024, in comparison with about 200,000 circumstances in all of 2023. The quantity within the second quarter of 2024 was additionally effectively above that within the first quarter. Notably, about one in six determinations are made in circumstances the place just one occasion submitted a suggestion—a charge that has remained usually regular from 2023 to 2024. Discussions with stakeholders instructed that this final result could also be the results of plans being overwhelmed by case quantity and unable to reply earlier than deadlines.
Circumstances Stay Concentrated In A Few States
IDR use remained extremely concentrated by geography. States with excessive volumes of resolved circumstances had been usually the identical as in 2023: Texas, Florida, Arizona, Tennessee, Georgia, New Jersey, and New York. Against this, a number of large-population states (Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington) had fewer than 2,000 resolved circumstances within the first two quarters of 2024.
Suppliers had been most profitable in Texas, Florida, Arizona, and Virginia, with win charges between 89 % and 91 % of resolved cased in Q1 of 2024. This geographic focus is probably going considerably attributable to excessive concentrations of the supplier organizations that the majority ceaselessly used IDR. For instance, throughout most quarters, greater than half of the circumstances in Texas concerned Radiology Companions affiliated suppliers. Equally, two-thirds of Tennessee and Florida circumstances concerned Workforce Well being.
Suppliers Proceed To See Extra Success Than Plans
Suppliers proceed to win way more usually and at a lot greater supply quantities than plans. In 2023, the speed of suppliers prevailing rose from 70 % of resolved circumstances in Q1 to 87 % in This autumn. Charges in 2024 matched the latter ranges: suppliers received 88 % and 83 % of resolved circumstances in Q1 and Q2, respectively (Exhibit 2).
Exhibit 2. P.c of Resolved IDR Circumstances Received by Suppliers, Q1-This autumn 2023 and Q1-Q2 2024
Supply: Authors’ evaluation of Federal IDR PUFs, Reporting Yr 2023 and 2024.
Not solely do suppliers win way more usually, however their prevailing affords are a lot greater than plans. In Q1 of 2024, the median prevailing supplier supply was 383 % of QPA. This rose almost 70 share factors in Q2, with a median prevailing supplier supply of 447 % of QPA. Against this, the comparable charges in 2023 had been between 320 % and 350 %. In circumstances the place plans prevailed, their median supply quantity was a lot decrease: 105 % of QPA in each Q1 and Q2 of 2024.
Giant Supplier Teams Proceed To Prevail At Excessive Charges; Third-Occasion Entities Emerge
As in 2023, resolved IDR circumstances had been predominantly from a couple of massive supplier organizations – principally backed by personal fairness. Radiology Companions was probably the most frequent consumer of IDR in Q1 and Q2 of 2024, adopted by Workforce Well being, SCP Well being, AGS Well being, and HaloMD. Mixed, these 5 organizations account for almost two-thirds (63 %) of resolved circumstances (Exhibit 3).
Exhibit 3. Share of Resolved IDR Circumstances by High Supplier Organizations, Q1-Q2 2024
Supply: Authors’ evaluation of Federal IDR PUFs, Reporting Yr 2024.
Along with a excessive quantity of circumstances, these high 5 supplier organizations received the overwhelming majority of their disputes, with supply quantities a minimum of two occasions better than QPA. Radiology Companions considerably outmatched different supplier teams, with a median prevailing supply at 631 % of QPA and 610 % of QPA within the first half of 2024.
Whereas the exercise stage of Radiology Companions, Workforce Well being, SCP Well being, and AGS Well being remained comparatively steady from 2023 to 2024, HaloMD has emerged as a frequent participant in IDR circumstances. In 2023, HaloMD appeared in just one % of resolved disputes, whereas in Q2 of 2024, HaloMD initiated 10 % of disputes. HaloMD’s prevailing affords elevated considerably as effectively: in Q1 of 2023, the group prevailed in 17 % of resolved circumstances, however their win charge steadily elevated to 84 % in This autumn of 2023. This success charge seems steady, reaching 89 % and 81 % in Q1 and Q2 of 2024.
HaloMD was particularly created “to be the main supplier of IDR companies.” HaloMD illustrates the rise of revenue enhancing middlemen centered on the IDR course of. Whereas massive supplier organizations like Radiology Companions and Workforce Well being have the inner sources to handle disputes on behalf of their suppliers, HaloMD and different third-party organizations can tackle the executive burden for smaller suppliers and supply them a better alternative to interact in IDR. As a supplier group conversant in the IDR course of wrote in a earlier Forefront piece, “smaller practices have much less capacity to entry IDR than do bigger, well-capitalized organizations.” This development is perhaps altering with the rise of IDR-specific middlemen.
Emergency And Radiology Providers Account For Two-Thirds Of Resolved IDR Circumstances
The median prevailing affords relative to QPA in Q1 and Q2 of 2024, by supplier specialty, usually match or exceed these in 2023 (Exhibit 4). For many specialties, the median share of QPA grew throughout the 4 quarters of 2023.
Exhibit 4. Median Prevailing Supply amongst Resolved IDR Circumstances as P.c of QPA by Specialty, Q1-This autumn 2023 and Q1-Q2 2024
Supply: Authors’ evaluation of Federal IDR PUFs, Reporting Yr 2023 and 2024.
Radiology and emergency companies are the 2 specialties with the best quantity of resolved circumstances, accounting for about two-thirds of all determinations (not proven). Within the first half of 2024, the median prevailing supply for emergency companies was 257 % of QPA, a greater than 30 share level improve from 224 % in This autumn of 2023. Radiology companies skilled an identical improve in win quantities: within the first half of 2024, the median prevailing supply in radiology circumstances was 40 share factors greater than the top of 2023 (600 % QPA and 559 % QPA, respectively). These specialties are intently correlated to sure supplier teams. For instance, Radiology Companions accounts for almost all of radiology circumstances, whereas Workforce Well being, SCP Well being, and Envision symbolize effectively over half of all emergency circumstances.
Neurology and surgical procedure, although a smaller quantity (about 9 % of resolved circumstances in 2024), received a lot greater awards than radiology or emergency companies. In Q1 of 2024, the median prevailing occasion supply for neurology was 1222 % of QPA, adopted by 1178 % in Q2. The median prevailing occasion supply for surgical procedure was 1818 % of QPA in Q1 and 1716 % of QPA in Q2.
Plan Presents Minimally Enhance; Win Charges Stay Low
Plan success in IDR is mostly comparable throughout 2023 and 2024. In 2023, the speed of plans prevailed declined from 28 % of resolved circumstances in Q1 to fifteen % in This autumn. Outcomes from 2024 are comparable: plans received 14 % of resolved circumstances in Q1 and 18 % in Q2. As beforehand said, in circumstances the place plans prevailed, the median prevailing supply quantity was 105 % in each quarters of 2024—a small, however not insignificant, improve of 5 % from 2023. This shift may point out some effort by plans to answer their historical past of dropping IDR circumstances.
In Q1 and Q2 of 2024, the majority of resolved IDR circumstances concerned a couple of massive plans as recipients of circumstances filed by suppliers. United Healthcare, Aetna, HCSC, and Anthem accounted for 2 thirds of circumstances. By one nationwide measure, these 4 firms account for almost half of the nationwide insurer market.
Third occasion claims administration firms account for a minimum of a fifth of resolved circumstances. MultiPlan (now Claritev) and Clear Well being Methods are the 2 largest entities (13 % and seven %, respectively). The elevated quantity of circumstances attributable to administration firms might be proof that plans, like suppliers, additionally leverage intermediaries to handle their disputes and maximize their OON claims income.
Vital Variation Amongst IDR Entity Quantity and Choices
The tempo of IDR entity decision-making has considerably accelerated in 2024, yielding hope that case backlogs will probably be decreased. However our conversations with stakeholders have indicated one other potential concern: that some IDR entities might determine in favor of suppliers considerably greater than others. This concern is supported by our evaluation of PUF knowledge. We discover that 4 IDR entities made choices favoring suppliers in over 90 % of their circumstances in 2024, whereas one entity favored suppliers in solely one-third of its circumstances. Ideally, the general decision-making sample ought to be comparable throughout all IDREs, so will probably be vital to know why variations exist.
Litigation And The IDR Course of
Litigation additionally continues to form the implementation of the NSA. A number of ongoing circumstances and appeals may have a big impression on the success of the arbitration course of and its position in affecting well being care prices extra broadly.
Suppliers, led by the Texas Medical Affiliation, efficiently leveraged litigation to block previous efforts by the Biden Administration to place modest guardrails in place regarding how arbitration entities ought to contemplate and weigh the related statutory components when deciding between two affords. However suppliers haven’t been profitable in circumstances throughout the board. The Biden Administration received an enchantment earlier than a Fifth Circuit panel final fall in an additional problem introduced by the Texas Medical Affiliation and air ambulance suppliers (generally known as “TMA III”) regarding sure regulatory provisions outlining the calculation of the QPA. That call overturned a lot (although not all) of the decrease courtroom’s choice siding with the suppliers. However authorized fights over the QPA methodology have nonetheless not concluded. The suppliers requested the total Fifth Circuit to reverse the panel—and on Could 30, 2025, the fifth Circuit issued an order vacating the earlier opinion and directing that the case be reheard en banc (by all energetic judges on the courtroom). Briefing will run by means of early September 2025 (with oral argument to be scheduled subsequently). Whereas sure enforcement discretion associated to the QPA stays in impact till August 1, 2025, future company steerage could also be wanted to make clear the rapid impression of this growth on sufferers and the arbitration course of.
In one other case on pause in federal district courtroom in Kentucky, suppliers challenged a number of NSA regulatory provisions beneath the Administrative Process Act and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Modification. Varied different ongoing circumstances relate to efforts to overturn sure arbitration awards or compel cost by a celebration to arbitration. Some contain circumstances introduced by suppliers in opposition to insurers and arbitration entities instantly. The ends in such circumstances have been combined to date, with appeals filed within the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits. The Division of Justice (DOJ), by means of amicus briefs, has urged courts to search out that arbitration entities themselves will not be correct events to such circumstances—arguing that such litigation finally may end in “thwarting Congress’s need to create a low-cost, environment friendly” arbitration course of. As to alleged nonpayment by events to the arbitration course of as soon as IDR cost determinations have been made, DOJ has additionally instructed courts that if events can’t get hold of reduction in courts for such nonpayment, “one of many [NSA]’s core options can be pissed off, upending Congress’s scheme.”
Insurers have additionally filed a number of lawsuits alleging supplier abuse of the IDR course of by means of submitting ineligible circumstances in an effort to get hold of improper cost charges. Such circumstances stay within the early levels, but when they proceed, discovery may shed extra mild on how sure suppliers are strategically leveraging the IDR course of.
What Does It All Imply?
The evaluation of resolved IDR circumstances exhibits that suppliers are sometimes turning to IDR somewhat than accepting preliminary plan funds. Though the vast majority of circumstances are deemed eligible for the IDR course of, plans are difficult the eligibility of almost half the circumstances that suppliers file.
These excessive numbers spotlight the disconnect between the 2 sides as they debate what constitutes an inexpensive cost for OON companies. Suppliers imagine the excessive quantity of IDR disputes displays insufficient cost by plans, exacerbated by attainable manipulation of the QPA. Plans reply that their QPAs are correct and that suppliers ought to be prepared to simply accept funds that align intently with in-network charges. Amidst this debate, the federal authorities has launched the outcomes of 1 QPA audit, and extra audits may shed some mild on the contrasting claims round QPAs.
Findings from the IDR knowledge elevate two vital issues. First, IDR circumstances are considerably concentrated amongst only a few supplier organizations. Second, middlemen organizations are more and more frequent customers of the system. On one hand, intermediary organizations may prolong entry to the IDR course of to suppliers who will not be a part of massive organizations and thus face administrative burdens in utilizing the system. Then again, such organizations might contribute to greater general case quantity, rising prices for the entire well being system.
Moreover, suppliers proceed to have a excessive share of circumstances determined of their favor, leading to massive cost awards. Suppliers make the case that their affords are merely extra cheap and that arbitrators agree. There are additionally some anecdotal studies that plans have been much less aggressive than suppliers in placing their arguments in entrance of the IDR entities. Because the federal businesses famous in background supplies: “Whereas well being plans and issuers usually benchmarked their affords to the QPA, suppliers, services, and air ambulance service suppliers usually benchmarked their affords to previous OON cost quantities with the disputing plan or issuers and previous in-network charges with both the disputing plan or issuer, or with a distinct plan or issuer in the identical state.” Plans have raised issues that historic benchmarks might mirror circumstances earlier than passage of the NSA when some plans paid full billed prices to make sure that prices weren’t handed alongside to shoppers. With out public reporting of the rationale for IDR entity choices, observers can solely speculate how a lot historic funds affect the choices.
The excessive quantity of IDR circumstances, together with the prevalence of ineligible circumstances, might be tempered if proposed guidelines for course of enhancements had been finalized and if ongoing litigation over the QPA methodology was resolved. Higher training, coaching, and oversight of IDR entity decision-making may also assist scale back among the uncertainties within the course of.
The longer-term impression of IDR choices on well being prices continues to be principally unknown. On the floor, it appears that evidently the excessive supplier profitable charge and the scale of the funds awarded would elevate well being prices and plan premiums. However the magnitude of any such improve is proscribed by the share of all well being care claims represented by the IDR circumstances. Moreover, stakeholder claims diverge wildly on whether or not we have now seen an impression of the NSA on the scale of supplier networks or on negotiations over the charges paid to suppliers.
Notably, nothing in these findings from the IDR course of raises questions in regards to the effectiveness of the NSA in stopping shoppers from experiencing shock payments within the eventualities the place the NSA created protections. The problem stays whether or not the legislation’s mechanism for establishing an inexpensive cost from plans to suppliers is working. To the extent it isn’t, a key query is whether or not there are price implications for the well being care system as an entire and for shoppers particularly.
To study extra about variation within the IDR course of and potential price implications, learn the lately printed companion piece: No Surprises Act Arbitrators Differ Considerably In Their Determination Making Patterns.
Jack Hoadley, Kennah Watts, and Zachary Baron “Impartial Dispute Decision Course of 2024 Information: Excessive Quantity, Extra Supplier Wins” June 11, 2025, https://www.healthaffairs.org/content material/forefront/independent-dispute-resolution-process-2024-data-high-volume-more-provider-wins. Copyright © 2025 Well being Affairs by Undertaking HOPE – The Folks-to-Folks Well being Basis, Inc.