In a room outdoors the Maryland State Senate chamber final winter, client advocates have been assembly privately with lawmakers to elucidate how debtors have been dropping their properties over “zombie” loans, outdated second mortgages that they hadn’t heard from lenders about in years. On the time, the legislature was contemplating a invoice to guard householders from unfair makes an attempt to gather these money owed.
Then Robert Enten barged in. The lobbyist for the Maryland Bankers Affiliation started shouting about his opposition to the invoice, in keeping with three individuals with data of the occasion who requested to not be recognized discussing a non-public dialog. Others started shouting again, and the assembly quickly broke up. Within the weeks after, the invoice handed the Home of Delegates unanimously however stalled within the Senate and died.
“Sadly, we ran up in opposition to a calendar situation,” mentioned Delegate Dana Jones, who co-sponsored the laws within the Home and reintroduced the measure this yr. Enten declined to remark.
The episode highlighted how vehemently opposed elements of the monetary business have develop into to new client protections for zombie mortgages. Regardless of proof submitted in lawsuits displaying some debt collectors have demanded again curiosity for intervals exceeding the statutes of limitations, the business argues that abuses are uncommon whereas any disruption to the shopping for and promoting of mortgages on the secondary market would hurt dwelling lending extra broadly.
A Bloomberg Information investigation final yr discovered that greater than 600,000 second mortgages taken out earlier than the 2008 monetary disaster — after which largely forgotten amid a wave of mortgage modifications throughout the restoration — stay excellent throughout the nation. Debt collectors purchase these mortgages for pennies on the greenback after which demand householders pay payments that usually embrace years of again curiosity.
Almost all states have statutes of limitations that prohibit residential foreclosures if an excessive amount of time has handed. These protections fluctuate from only a few years after a debt turns into because of a decade or extra. Even so, customers who spoke with Bloomberg mentioned they have been unaware of the bounds when approached by debt collectors.
Consideration on zombie mortgages has been rising as public-interest attorneys file lawsuits and collect proof that their shoppers are the victims of illegal makes an attempt to gather. Many of those advocates say the urgency for states to beef up client protections has elevated because the Trump administration gutted the Client Monetary Safety Bureau final yr.
The company had been elevating the alarm about zombie second mortgages since 2023 and was investigating at the very least three corporations concerned in gathering them, Bloomberg reported final yr. A spokesperson for the CFPB mentioned the enforcement effort has not been deserted, however declined to elaborate.
In states like Maryland, the place Democrats management the legislature and governor’s workplace, measures that may make it simpler for customers to contest unfair payments have confronted resistance. Solely 4 states have managed to cross laws addressing zombie loans, and at the very least one in every of them is going through a authorized problem.
A commerce group representing the debt-collection business mentioned this state-by-state strategy to regulation, relatively than nationwide guidelines, is inefficient and results in better prices for customers.
“Having one federal normal is simpler to manage than a number of state legal guidelines with completely different necessities,” mentioned Scott Purcell, chief government officer of the ACA Worldwide, an affiliation for the credit score and collections business. He added that his group’s members sometimes preserve strong compliance packages for each state and federal legal guidelines.
For debtors, the absence of federal enforcement of client safety legal guidelines exposes them to debt collectors who’ve been accused of exploiting holes within the patchwork of state legal guidelines or ignoring them altogether, in keeping with a evaluate of greater than 140 lawsuits. That’s why client advocates have argued for brand new protections in legislatures throughout the US.
“It’s like reinventing the wheel in every state,” mentioned Andrea Bopp Stark, a senior lawyer on the Nationwide Client Regulation Heart, which has proposed mannequin laws to deal with zombie loans.
In California, client advocates discovered that even after a regulation is adopted, the challenges aren’t over.
In June, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a regulation that requires debt collectors to attest to correct, steady administration of the mortgage, or acknowledge lapses, in the event that they need to foreclose by way of the state’s swifter, non-judicial course of.
Lower than three months later, commerce teams representing non-public lenders and credit score unions, together with debt assortment corporations and several other nameless collectors filed a federal lawsuit contesting the brand new guidelines. They mentioned the measure violated their constitutional rights and would make it tougher for Californians to get credit score.
The regulation “arbitrarily applies to a vastly broader class of mortgage loans than this sort of outlier ‘zombie mortgage’ that the brand new statute was meant to treatment,” they mentioned in a submitting.
At the least one of many corporations that joined the swimsuit has been straight concerned in gathering zombie loans lately. The plaintiff, ZBS Regulation, managed the foreclosures of a house outdoors San Francisco for a debt purchaser that Bloomberg profiled in October.
The regulation agency mentioned in a authorized submitting that the brand new statute would open it, and different foreclosures corporations, to legal responsibility in the event that they didn’t adhere to its “imprecise” necessities. Robert McWhorter, an lawyer at Buchalter representing ZBS and the opposite plaintiffs within the swimsuit, declined to remark.
California’s Division of Justice, which is defending the regulation, has emphasised in authorized filings that the plaintiffs had didn’t show that it had brought on a widespread upheaval within the mortgage market. In a authorized temporary this yr, they cited Bloomberg’s reporting on the scope of the zombie mortgage disaster and hurt to customers.
A spokesperson for Legal professional Normal Rob Bonta’s workplace declined to remark. The federal decide listening to the case has but to rule on the state’s effort to dismiss the lawsuit, and the enterprise group’s push to strike down the necessities.
Officers from states which have put client protections in place mentioned the considerations the monetary business has raised — that prices will go up and other people may have bother getting loans — have to date not materialized.
Virginia lawmakers handed a brand new provision in 2024 that required debt collectors to signal authorized paperwork testifying that the quantity of again curiosity owed was correct earlier than foreclosing on outdated second mortgages. Kristi Kelly, a public-interest lawyer who inspired adoption of the regulation, mentioned zombie foreclosures seemingly stopped within the state for a yr afterward.
When the measure was into account, although, some debt collectors mentioned it could make it “too dangerous” for them to pursue even official money owed, mentioned Delegate Marcus Simon, who sponsored the measure.
“All people tailored to comply with the regulation,” mentioned Simon, a Democrat whose district covers a part of the DC suburbs. “It took them a bit bit longer to foreclose, and it’s a smaller variety of foreclosures. However, on steadiness, that’s a comparatively small value to keep away from predatory actors taking individuals’s properties.”
In Maryland, Delegate Jones, who represents Annapolis and surrounding areas, initially labored with the state’s Workplace of Monetary Regulation to craft a measure that may defend customers from zombie loans, counting on a fancy process for contesting foreclosures. It was whereas legislators have been weighing this draft that the buyer advocates met privately with senators, in keeping with individuals aware of the occasion.
The dialogue was an opportunity for advocates to make the case for why the extra protections have been wanted. It started cordially sufficient. Proponents of the invoice spoke of Marylanders who’d confronted shockingly massive payments on mortgages that they hadn’t heard about in additional than a decade, and the way troublesome it was to contest debt collectors’ assertions of what was owed.
However when Enten interrupted, the back-room dialogue devolved, the individuals mentioned, with the veteran lobbyist reducing others off and pounding his fists. After a couple of minutes, Senator William Smith, who chairs the committee that was debating the invoice, broke the assembly up, saying he’d heard sufficient, in keeping with two of the individuals. Smith didn’t reply to questions despatched to his chief of workers. The proposal by no means made it out of Smith’s committee.
By March 2025, Delegate Jones and her colleagues had revised and simplified the invoice, which might bar residential foreclosures 10 years after default. Maryland and Alabama are the one states with no statute of limitation for residential foreclosures. The invoice additionally required debt collectors to supply extra proof that they have been charging an correct quantity of curiosity on second mortgages that had been delinquent for 5 years or extra.
The revised model handed the Home 139-0 final March.
Even in Maryland’s compressed legislative session, the Senate had time to behave final yr. However, in the end, the clock ran out.
In an interview in January, Jones mentioned she was undeterred. “The concept this could be allowed, that householders who thought they have been protected are being focused at a time when individuals are attempting to afford groceries, is unbelievable,” she mentioned.
She’s extra optimistic in regards to the invoice’s passage this yr. The Home authorised it final Thursday, however it hasn’t handed out of committee within the Senate.
And there are nonetheless opponents.
Final month, throughout a listening to on the invoice, Enten cautioned delegates in opposition to making adjustments that may restrict banks’ skills to promote loans. “This can be a miniscule situation, however a regulation that we’re very a lot afraid may have a critical impression on the secondary market.”
Bloomberg’s evaluation final yr discovered practically 25,000 outdated second mortgages are nonetheless excellent in Maryland.
High photograph: Kristi Kelly, a public-interest lawyer, in her workplace in Fairfax, Virginia. Photographer: Alyssa Schukar/Bloomberg.
Copyright 2026 Bloomberg.
Subjects
California
Maryland