By Nadia Stovicek and Kennah Watts
Whereas Indiana lawmakers have been working to scale back well being care prices for business medical insurance for greater than a decade, this legislative session was significantly productive. A bevy of well being care price reform payments targeted on pricing, transparency, and antitrust points had been enacted, and these efforts had been complemented by two govt orders from Governor Mike Braun aimed toward reining in hospital market energy. With these legislative and govt department actions, Indiana has launched into a path to enhance well being care affordability for Hoosiers and set an instance for different states.
Legislative and Administrative Motion on Value Containment in 2025
Indiana had a rare legislative session. Out of ten payments launched aiming to constrain well being care price progress, the legislature enacted six (see desk under). These payments focused quite a lot of levers to scale back system vast prices for medical insurance, some utilizing novel strategies corresponding to::
- HEA 1666 and HEA 1004, which require possession or monetary info reporting from suppliers, respectively, together with info on any non-public fairness affiliation.
- HEA 1004 requires a reference-based worth ceiling for any hospital that contracts with an employer well being care association, outlined as an association between a hospital, hospital system, nonprofit hospital, and slim community of hospitals.
- SEA 3 requires third-party directors (TPAs) and pharmacy profit managers (PBMs) to behave as fiduciaries of the well being plans with which they contract. The invoice defines fiduciary responsibility to imply working in the very best curiosity of their shoppers.
Desk. Legislative Motion from Indiana’s one hundred and twenty fifth Legislative Session
| Invoice quantity | Value containment mechanism(s) | Abstract |
| HEA 1003 | Transparency, antitrust | Codifies federal Hospital Value Transparency rule; prohibits PBMs and TPAs from redacting claims knowledge through commerce secrets and techniques assertion; prohibits anti-tiering and all-or-nothing contract provisions |
| HEA 1004 | Value regulation; monetary transparency | Giant nonprofit hospitals techniques can not cost greater than combination common statewide business costs or threat shedding their state tax exempt standing; suppliers should report on monetary and possession standing; payers and TPAs should disclose fee charges; hospitals that contract with worker profit plans should cost at or under a benchmark of 260 % of Medicare; TPAs should present claims knowledge together with digital billing (837s) and supplier funds (835s) inside 15 enterprise days of an employer request |
| HEA 1666 | Monetary and possession transparency; antitrust | Will increase lawyer normal’s authority to analyze market transactions amongst well being care entities; requires monetary and possession reporting by suppliers |
| SEA 3 | Fiduciary responsibility reform | Requires TPAs and PBMs to behave as fiduciaries; defines fiduciary duties |
| SEA 119 | Antitrust | Bans functions for certificates of public benefit (COPA) after Could 13, 2025 |
| SEA 475 | Antitrust | Bans non-compete agreements between physicians and hospitals or hospital techniques, or a father or mother firm of a hospital or an affiliated supervisor of a hospital |
Governor Braun additionally issued two associated govt orders:
- Government Order 21 requires the state to evaluate the effectiveness of worth transparency measures and develop a penalty for suppliers and payers that don’t adjust to transparency necessities.
- Government Order 22 requires nonprofit hospitals to yearly confirm that they supply extra in charity care than they obtain in state tax breaks; hospitals that don’t present this verification will likely be denied the tax exemption.
Mixed, these efforts mark a few of the most important advances in insurance policies to constrain business market price progress of any state thus far. Nonetheless, these reforms weren’t enacted in a single day—they required years of schooling, coordination, and advocacy to change into regulation.
How Transparency, Persistence, and Coalition Constructing Led to Success
Indiana’s extraordinary 2025 legislative session was a product of years of devoted advocacy to enhance transparency and sort out the basis trigger of upper well being care prices. The story could be traced again to the Employers’ Discussion board of Indiana, a multi-stakeholder coalition created to enhance the worth employers obtain from their funding in well being care advantages. When Gloria Sachdev, a former pharmacist, took the helm of the Employers’ Discussion board in 2015, she posed a easy query to her coalition of largely self-insured employers, “what’s your greatest ache level?” The reply got here swiftly and unanimously: “well being care affordability.”
Nonetheless, employers couldn’t simply establish how a lot they paid for medical companies. With little to no transparency from hospitals and insurers, employers couldn’t successfully push for the correct reforms. Sachdev and the Employers’ Discussion board due to this fact piloted the Employer Value Transparency Challenge to assist employers and well being care purchasers use hospital pricing knowledge to pursue higher-value healthcare. The undertaking started with RAND 1.0, the primary publicly out there employer worth transparency examine in america that offered costs alongside the names of the person hospitals. RAND printed the examine in 2017 with knowledge from Indiana hospitals and costs paid by self-funded employer plans. The examine outcomes had been surprising: Indiana employers had been paying, on common, 272 % of Medicare charges. For outpatient care, that quantity jumped to 358 % of Medicare. Given these outcomes, employers and—importantly—their elected representatives started to take discover and demand reform.
To refine the info and perceive Indiana’s price setting in comparison with different states, the RAND research have expanded nationwide. The newest iteration, RAND 5.1, consists of knowledge on hospital costs throughout 49 states and DC (Maryland is excluded due to its distinctive all-payer mannequin). With these findings, the Employer Value Transparency Challenge launched Sage Transparency, a software to supply employers, policymakers, and advocates easy accessibility to cost and high quality knowledge. These two instruments have change into the inspiration not simply to grasp costs, however to problem them.
The information and dashboard had been needed however alone not sufficient to domesticate change. The Employers’ Discussion board collected details about ache factors from its main employer members to assist educate coverage makers on well being care pricing points and construct public help. Impressed by Sachdev’s work, former Indiana Republican Get together Chair Al Hubbard launched Hoosiers for Inexpensive Healthcare, a bunch devoted to pushing for legislative reform. Sachdev grew to become the vice chair and shortly bipartisan advocacy efforts had been underway. The group then constructed shopper help with a media marketing campaign and a easy message: larger hospital costs imply smaller Hoosier paychecks and inflated premiums.
Spurred by worth knowledge and arranged advocacy, prior classes of the Indiana legislature handed payments to ban extra hospital charges, prohibit non-compete clauses for main care, require merger reporting to the lawyer normal, and set up a Well being Care Value Oversight Process Pressure. The method of debating and enacting these payments helped educate lawmakers and the general public and set the stage for the profitable 2025 legislative session. Different states are additionally taking discover––Indiana’s methods to advance price containment have impressed Texas and Maine to launch their very own transparency-driven campaigns.
Wanting Ahead
The issue of excessive and rising well being care prices are on no account solved in Indiana. Far more stays to be accomplished to ship actual worth reduction to Indiana employers and shoppers. Nonetheless, the state’s appreciable progress can serve for instance to different states of how transparency, educated coalitions, and chronic advocacy can create an setting ripe for coverage change that bends the worth curve.
The authors thank Dave Kelleher and Sara Otte of the Employers’ Discussion board of Indiana, in addition to Luke Thomas from Hallowell Consulting, for his or her evaluation and considerate feedback on this weblog put up.