When dealing with Nationwide Flood Insurance coverage Program (NFIP) claims, public adjusters and policyholders have to be alert to crucial warning indicators. Probably the most vital phrases to acknowledge is: “We denied a portion of your declare.” These few phrases, even when buried in a prolonged letter, ought to ring loud alarm bells. Beneath NFIP guidelines, a partial denial — no matter whether or not a proper, compliant proof of loss has been filed — begins the statute of limitations time clock ticking for submitting a lawsuit. If go well with isn’t filed inside one yr of that denial, the declare is endlessly barred. I’ve warned about this beforehand in All Nationwide Flood Insurance coverage Letters Are Vital—Technical Denials of Solely a A part of a Declare Begin the One-Yr Time to File Swimsuit.
This tough lesson was bolstered within the current case of Martini v. American Bankers Insurance coverage Firm of Florida. 1 After Hurricane Ian triggered extreme flood harm to their house, the policyholders submitted a declare. The insurer’s November 16, 2022, letter notified them that sure damages weren’t coated below their Normal Flood Insurance coverage Coverage as a result of the broken property was situated under the elevated ground, which restricted protection below NFIP guidelines. The letter clearly acknowledged, “We denied a portion of your declare.” Though the letter additionally inspired the insureds to hunt supplemental funds in the event that they discovered further harm, the courtroom discovered that this preliminary partial denial was sufficient to start out the one-year clock for submitting a lawsuit.
The policyholders and their attorneys tried to argue that later exercise — reminiscent of submitting an extra proof of loss and receiving one other denial — reset the clock. The courtroom rejected that argument, declaring that the legislation and the NFIP coverage phrases are clear: as soon as any portion of the declare is denied, the time restrict begins. No supplemental proofs of loss, negotiations, or appeals can lengthen or toll that one-year interval.
Including insult to harm, the unique proof of loss filed by the general public adjuster on this case was deeply flawed. As a substitute of utilizing FEMA’s official NFIP Proof of Loss type, the adjuster ready a non-compliant doc. Courts and insurers deal with these improperly filed proofs of loss as invalid. A compliant proof of loss is greater than only a piece of paperwork — it’s a necessary situation for cost below the NFIP. Failure to make use of the right type, sworn and signed with the required documentation, can doom even a wonderfully professional declare.
It must be famous that the general public adjuster later filed a proof of lack of a FEMA-required type. However that act didn’t reset the time for submitting a lawsuit.
This case ought to function a warning. When a denial letter states {that a} portion of the declare has been denied, the insured and their representatives should instantly acknowledge the authorized penalties. Whether or not or not a legitimate proof of loss has been submitted and whether or not or not additional discussions or dietary supplements are pending, the one-year statute of limitations has begun. Public adjusters should even be meticulous in making ready proofs of loss, making certain they use FEMA’s required types and comply strictly with NFIP pointers. They need to alert their consumer of the statute of limitations and the necessity to rent counsel about this deadline. Failure to take action could possibly be grounds for a malpractice declare towards the general public adjuster.
Failing to grasp or heed these necessities could be deadly to a flood insurance coverage declare. In flood litigation, there are not any second possibilities in relation to lacking the statute of limitations or submitting a faulty proof of loss. In each flood case, make sure a compliant and well timed filed proof of loss is accomplished. Then, watch the one-year statute of limitations time. These are two of essentially the most prolific points the place Nationwide Flood claims are misplaced earlier than the combat begins.
Thought For The Day
“Time is extra useful than cash. You will get more cash, however you can’t get extra time.”
—Jim Rohn
1 Martini v. American Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida, No. 2:24-cv-904 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2025).